Ecografía multiórgano en infección por SARS-COV-2 / Multi-organ ultrasound for SARS-COV-2 disease

Aim: There is growing evidence regarding the imaging ultrasound findings of coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19. Multi-organ ultrasoundhas played a significant role in the diagnosis and follow-up of thesepatients. The aim of this study was to describe the ultrasound findingsat pulmonary, cardiac and deep venous system of the lower extremities in patients with SARS-COV-2 infection.Material and method: Prospective, cross-sectional, observationalstudy was conducted in patients with confirmed COVID-19 who underwent a multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) examinationduring hospitalization.Results: A total of 107 patients were enrolled. Lung involvement waspresent in 100% of the patients, 93.4% bilaterally involvement. Themost affected lung area was the posteroinferior (94.39%) followed bythe lateral (89.72%). Subpleural consolidations were present in 71%of patients and consolidations larger than 1 cm in 25%. More echographic lung involvement is relational with the degree of respiratoryinsufficiency. Only two patients had proximal deep vein thrombosisin the lower extremities, 27 angiography tomography scan were performed and pulmonary thromboembolism was confirmed in 14 patients. The most frequent echocardiographic findings were impairedleft ventricular relaxation and left ventricular hypertrophy. All patientswith thromboembolic disease had severe or critical echocardiographicpulmonary involvement.Conclusions: Multi-organ POCUS ultrasound may be useful for themanifestations of COVID-19. The degree of lung ultrasound involvement was related to the degree of respiratory failure and to the presence of VTED. The relationship between DVT and PTE was lower thanexpected. Cardiac involvement has little relevance in our series. (AU)

Objetivo: Existe una creciente evidencia con respecto a los hallazgosecográficos y la COVID-19, destacando la ecografía multiórgano parael diagnóstico y el seguimiento de estos pacientes. El objetivo fuedescribir los hallazgos ecográficos a nivel pulmonar, cardiaco y delsistema venoso profundo de extremidades inferiores en pacientes coninfección por SARS-COV-2.Material y Métodos: Estudio prospectivo, transversal y observacionalrealizado en pacientes con COVID-19 confirmado a los que se lesrealizó una ecografía multiórgano en el punto de atención durante lahospitalización.Resultados: Un total de 107 pacientes se inscribieron. El 100% delos pacientes tenían afectación pulmonar (93,4% bilateral). Las zonaspulmonares más afectadas fueron la posteroinferior (94,39%) y la lateral (89,72%). Se observó consolidaciones subpleurales en el 71%de los pacientes y consolidaciones mayores de 1 cm en el 25%. Amayor afectación pulmonar ecográfica, mayor grado de insuficienciarespiratoria. 2 pacientes presentaron TVP proximal en extremidadesinferiores. Se realizaron 27 Angiotomografía computarizada confirmándose tromboembolismo pulmonar en 14 pacientes. Los hallazgosecocardiográficos más frecuentes fueron: alteración de la relajacióndel ventrículo izquierdo e hipertrofia ventricular izquierda. Todos lospacientes con enfermedad tromboembólica tenían una afectación pulmonar ecográfica grave o crítica.Conclusión: la ecografia multiórgano puede ser útil para lasmanifestaciones de la COVID-19. El grado de afectación ecográficapulmonar se relacionó con el grado de insuficiencia respiratoria y conla presencia de ETEV. La relación entre TVP y TEP fue más baja de loesperado. La afectación cardiaca fue poco relevante en nuestra serie. (AU)

Usefulness of lung ultrasound in the early identification of severe COVID-19: results from a prospective study.

AIM: There is growing evidence regarding the imaging findings of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in lung ultrasound (LUS); however, its role in predicting the prognosis has yet to be explored. The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between lung ultrasound findings with the degree of respiratory failure measured by the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (PaFi) andthe prognosis of these patients: need for non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV), admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and mortality. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Prospective, longitudinal and observational study performed in patients with confirmed COVID-19 underwent a LUS examination and laboratory tests. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were enrolled: 93.4% with bilateral involvement and 73.83% presented at least one consolidation. A good inverse correlation (Rho Spearman coefficient -0.897) between the ultrasound score and PaFi was obtained. The AUC for identification of patients with more severe respiratory failure, a moderate and severe ARDS, was 0.97 (CI 95%: 0.95-1) and a cut-off score of 34.5 showed a sensitivity of 0.94 and a specificity of 0.91. The Kappa index showed a high concordance (0.83) of the classification by ultrasound lunginvolvement and ARDS. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of the ultrasound score and the presence of respiratory failure can easily identify patients with a higher risk to present complications.

Importance of Lung Ultrasound Follow-Up in Patients Who Had Recovered from Coronavirus Disease 2019: Results from a Prospective Study.

There is growing evidence regarding the imaging findings of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in lung ultrasounds, however, their role in predicting the prognosis has yet to be explored. Our objective was to assess the usefulness of lung ultrasound in the short-term follow-up (1 and 3 months) of patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, and to describe the progression of the most relevant lung ultrasound findings. We conducted a prospective, longitudinal and observational study performed in patients with confirmed COVID-19 who underwent a lung ultrasound examination during hospitalization and repeated it 1 and 3 months after hospital discharge. A total of 96 patients were enrolled. In the initial ultrasound, bilateral involvement was present in 100% of the patients with mild, moderate or severe ARDS. The most affected lung area was the posteroinferior (93.8%) followed by the lateral (88.7%). Subpleural consolidations were present in 68% of the patients and consolidations larger than 1 cm in 24%. One month after the initial study, only 20.8% had complete resolution on lung ultrasound. This percentage rose to 68.7% at 3 months. Residual lesions were observed in a significant percentage of patients who recovered from moderate or severe ARDS (32.4% and 61.5%, respectively). In conclusion, lung injury associated with COVID-19 might take time to resolve. The findings in this report support the use of lung ultrasound in the short-term follow-up of patients recovered from COVID-19, as a radiation-sparing, easy to use, novel care path worth exploring.

Utility of lateral flow tests in SARS-CoV-2 infection monitorization / Utilidad de los test lateral Flow en la monitorización de la infección por SARS-CoV-2

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is crucial for medical and public health reasons, to allow the best treatment of cases and the best control of the pandemic. Serology testing allows for the detection of asymptomatic infections and 19-COVID cases once the virus has been cleared. We analyzed the usefulness of the SARS-CoV-2 rapid test of Autobio and tried to correlate its pattern with the severity of COVID19 infection. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We analyzed the accuracy and clinical usefulness of a point-of-care IgM and/or IgG test for SARS-CoV-2 in 35 COVID-19 patients [12 (34.3%) mild-moderate and 23 (65.7%) severe-critical] admitted to a field hospital in Madrid, as well as in 5 controls. RESULTS: The mean time from the first day of symptoms to the antibody test was 28 days (SD: 8.7), similar according to the severity of the disease. All patients with SARS-CoV-2 PCR+ showed the corresponding IgG positivity, while these results were negative in all control individuals. A total of 26 (74%) cases also presented with positive IgM, 19 (83%) were severe-critical cases and 7 (58%) were mild-moderate cases. The IgM response lasted longer in the severe critical cases (mean: 29.7 days; SD: 8.4) compared to the moderate cases (mean: 21.2 days; SD: 2.0). CONCLUSIONS: Rapid serology tests are useful for the diagnosis of patients with COVID-19 (mainly IgG detection) and may also be correlated with the severity of the infection (based on IgM detection)

INTRODUCCIÓN: El diagnóstico de la infección por SARSCoV-2 es crucial por razones médicas y de salud pública, para permitir el mejor tratamiento de los casos y el mejor control de la pandemia. Las pruebas de serología permiten la detección de infecciones asintomáticas y de casos de COVID-19 una vez que se ha logrado la eliminación del virus. El objetivo fue analizar la utilidad del test rápido SARS-CoV-2 de Autobio e intentar correlacionar su patrón con la gravedad de la infección por COVID19. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Hemos analizado la precisión y la utilidad clínica de un test de IgM y/o IgG en el punto de atención para el SARS-CoV-2 en 35 pacientes COVID-19 [12 (34,3%) leves-moderados y 23 (65,7%) severos-críticos] ingresados en un hospital de campaña en Madrid, así como en 5 controles. RESULTADOS: El tiempo medio desde el primer día de síntomas hasta la prueba de anticuerpos fue de 28 días (DE: 8,7), similar según la gravedad de la enfermedad. Todos los pacientes con SARS-CoV-2 PCR+ mostraron la correspondiente positividad de IgG, mientras que estos resultados fueron negativos en todos los individuos de control. Un total de 26 (74%) casos también se presentaron con IgM positiva, 19 (83%) fueron casos severos-críticos y 7 (58%) fueron casos leves-moderados. La respuesta a la IgM duró más tiempo en los casos críticos severos (media: 29,7 días; DE: 8,4) en comparación con los casos moderados (media: 21,2 días; DE: 2,0). CONCLUSIONES: Las pruebas de serología rápida son de utilidad para el diagnóstico de los pacientes con COVID-19 (principalmente la detección de IgG) y también pueden estar correlacionadas con la gravedad de la infección (basada en la detección de IgM)